Between 1997 and mid-2008 the World Bank Group's support for health, nutrition, and population (HNP) provided $17 billion for government-run projects in the fields of nutrition, health, and family planning. An additional $873 million was invested in private health and pharmaceutical investments. Although these numbers may seem high, a report issued last week by the bank's Independent Evaluation Group revealed that one third of the 220 projects undertaken by the World Bank HNP had failed to achieve their goals. Furthermore, the emphasis on HIV/AIDS related projects has resulted in unsatisfactory outcomes, and progress in the nutrition and family planning sectors have greatly been inhibited by such unequivocal funding measures.
According to the evaluation, 7 out of 10 AIDS projects financed by the bank had failed to achieve satisfactory outcomes. In Africa, the epicenter of the AIDS pandemic, 8 out of 10 AIDS projects had unsatisfactory outcomes, one of the bank's worst records worldwide. The report insinuated that the failure is not a result of incompetent or ineffective programmes, but rather the inability of inexperienced or weak bureaucracies to carry out such complex projects (ironically, which were encouraged by the donor). Julian Schweitzer, the World Bank’s director of health, nutrition and population, admitted that inexperience and weakness was not just at the country level, but also "sometimes our own".
To improve the effectiveness of such programmes, the report suggested a simplification of projects, a reduction in the number of government ministries involved, and a focus on more modest objectives. Also addressed, was the need to improve programmes in developing nations, with a specific focus on Africa. Middle income countries ranked adequately in their ability to carry out such initiatives, but in Africa, more than three-quarters of the projects were deemed ineffective. The World Bank Group's support for health, nutrition and population needs to make an immediate effort to concentrate resources where they are most crucially needed, and more importantly to ensure that programmes are being carried out appropriately within these regions.
To improve the effectiveness of such programmes, the report suggested a simplification of projects, a reduction in the number of government ministries involved, and a focus on more modest objectives. Also addressed, was the need to improve programmes in developing nations, with a specific focus on Africa. Middle income countries ranked adequately in their ability to carry out such initiatives, but in Africa, more than three-quarters of the projects were deemed ineffective. The World Bank Group's support for health, nutrition and population needs to make an immediate effort to concentrate resources where they are most crucially needed, and more importantly to ensure that programmes are being carried out appropriately within these regions.
Aside from the issue of programme efficiency, the report detailed another important trend in global health, namely, the disproportionate attention and funding allotted to AIDS programmes in the last decade. Since 1997, foreign assistance for global health has increased, with a specific focus on HIV and AIDS. Although it is incredibly important to deal with such a deadly disease, the focus on family planning has greatly declined as a result of this relatively new emphasis on AIDS funding. In reaction to the report, Professor William Easterly of New York University stated that the evaluation of the World Bank confirmed "a fear that many of us have had for some time: that hugely disproportionate attention to AIDS has had a negative effect on aid efforts for all other health problems."
Since 1997, nearly 60% of World Bank HNP projects have focused on AIDS, while efforts aimed at tuberculosis, malaria and leprosy were granted significantly fewer resources (malaria made up only 3% of the projects, and tuberculosis only 2%). Family planning has also been negatively affected by the disproportionality of funds, and leaders of the evaluation group have realized the implications of this. Martha Ainsworth, lead author of the report, reaffirmed the groups commitment to increase funding for family planning by stating, "helping women control the number of children they bear is essential to reducing the high rates at which they die in childbirth in the poorest nations, the fact that no one’s been paying attention to reducing high fertility is critical for Africa."
Mr. Schweitzer, of the World Bank, strongly agreed with the evaluators call for greater efforts in family planning and nutrition, and reaffirmed the necessity of donors and recipient countries working together to coordinate projects and achieve targeted results. In recent years, PPD has advocated against global decrease in population and family planning funding, and it is our hope that such an internal evaluation will be a call to action for the World Bank Group's support for health, nutrition, and population to change their efforts. And as PPD has long recognized, an emphasis on the African region and family planning efforts are crucial to achieving progress worldwide.
To view an executive summary of the report, visit:
Interested in reading more about specific countries project performance assessment reports? Then check out: http://go.worldbank.org/3764K5QNI0
No comments:
Post a Comment